01/06/2019 | Commercial leases

Commentaire de l'arrêt de Cass. 3ème civ., 9 mai 2019, 16-24.701, FS-P+B+I

Administrer, juin 2019

Since the lease did not stipulate that co-ownership charges were to be borne by the tenant, the action for recovery of those charges paid without being due is not subject to the shortened five-year limitation period laid down in former Article 2277 of the Civil Code.

Blatter Seynaeve
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.